Pick an idea.
Make it your own.

1. Draw two bars with the same scale, one with 12 units and the other with seven.
2. Calculate the difference in capacity between the two pieces.
3. Write the inventory numbers next to the bars to keep each measure connected to the right object.

A paper comparison without needing containers or drinks.

1. Trace three segments on paper using the same scale: 46, 17 and 27.
2. Associate the first two to Cavez and the third to Devesa.
3. Note that the height does not in itself inform how much light each piece produced.

Works with drawing and measurements, without lighting or experimenting with old objects.

1. Compare this reading with the harvests of 1758.
2. It identifies the purpose of each text: religious narrative or response to a parish inquiry.
3. Write a question about food that each source helps to explore.

It is not necessary to accept the narrative as literal proof to study what it reveals about its context.

1. Write down the names of the places mentioned, without assigning them coordinates.
2. Connect Olela to the history of fairs and the church to the history of celebrations.
3. It distinguishes in the drawing what comes from the account of 1758 and the questions I would like to investigate.

A scheme of relationships between stories, not a geographical map or a visitation route.

1. Write the name of the object and, in a separate line, the function indicated by the Museum.
2. Compare with the function of a funnel to transfer liquids.
3. Use the example to imagine a record of a household appliance you know.

A reading and registration activity; it is neither a recipe nor a manufacturing proposal.

1. Make two columns, one for each ship described.
2. Associate with each column the theme of the paintings mentioned by the Abbot.
3. Compare it to the story of the five altars of St. Nicholas, keeping the descriptions and places separate.

The exercise is part of the document of 1758, not of a photograph of the current interior.

1. Draws a river and three cards: irrigation, mills and olive oil mills.
2. Connects each card to the places mentioned in the text when the document identifies them.
3. He adds a question about the present: what traces would it take to document to compare the two seasons?

Memory-based scheme 1758; does not indicate accesses or operating equipment.

1. Write bread, wine, olive oil and fruit on four cards.
2. Group the cards as productions mentioned in the 1758 document.
3. List questions that remain unanswered, such as cereals or fruit varieties: do not fill these gaps by assumption.

Proposal on paper or on screen, from reading and its sources. It does not require visit, collection of objects or confirmation of current conditions.

1. Draw the seven days of the week.
2. It marks the arrival on Tuesday and the departure on Thursday, as shown in the report.
3. Compared with the postage reading of Bucos: what did the two parishes share?

Historical calendar of 1758, no correspondence with current postal hours.