A story with millions of years
The rock age and landscape shape are not the same question.
Explore: Three questions for the same stone →Read here and view sources
The work of A. Almeida refers to a dating of the complex of Cabeceiras de Basto by the uranium-chumbo method, using the minerals zircon and monazite. The result cited is a minimum age of 311 ± 1 million years. It is a geological reference to the rock formation studied: it does not date the construction of a wall, nor establishes when a hillside has acquired the form that we see today.
The article integrates the minutes of the V National Congress of Geology, published in 1998. Upon reaching the value, Almeida refers to a work of geochronology with other authors, indicated in the bibliography. This chain of references allows us to understand where the number comes from: it is a result of investigation, not an age estimated by the color or size of the grains.
Reading a landscape forces you to separate time scales. One thing is the age attributed to the rocky complex; another, the transformation of relief; another, the moment when a stone was used in a construction. The three stories can cross on the same wall, but need different evidence.
Source and context
Accessed: . Editorial summary; the date of consultation is not the date of the facts.
