Rivers and mountains

The memory of 1758 describes the two rivers of Rio Douro running all year round, but arriving at the end of the course with little water in the summer. The vicar linked this decrease to the many levadas that supplied the fields. Dams, waterfalls and mills comprised a landscape of various works.

The crossings also varied: the report mentions wooden bridges between places and the church, as well as stone bridges in Teixeiras and Vilela. The margins were not just production spaces; it was necessary to move from one side to the other. This historical enumeration does not identify surviving structures or current accesses.

The document also explains why boats did not circulate: there were stones, waterfalls and dams, and insufficient flow for navigation. A river could be important for the economy of the parish without being a river transport route.

On the cultivated shores, the report mentions vine oaks; outside the fields, urzeira forests. Thus, the water helped to organize a landscape in which cultivation, vegetation and equipment were found. The answer was signed in 22 May 1758: summer is described as usual behavior, not as a measurement carried out this summer.

The vicar of Bucos described in 1758 two courses that eventually lost their name when entering the river of São Nicolau. One was Porto Souto, coming from the mountains of the Apple; the other, called the river of Millos, had origins referred to in Carrazedo and Figueiró do Monte.

The report combines water and work: cultivated margins, grain mills and water use in agriculture. It also mentions small wooden frames. Reading these elements together helps to imagine the links between fields, crossings and grinding. The names and uses belong to the document of 1758; they do not automatically identify the courses or structures that are on the ground today.

Porto Souto is described running all year, despite the reduced flow, with small falls on the north to south route. The other course had a more serene current. The vicar registers trouts and escalates in both: his attention passes from the movement of water to the fish and from there to the cultivated shores. It is not necessary to imagine a large river to understand the importance of these water lines in the life of the parish.

The text also allows us to compare two crossing scales: the Casares bridge, on a busy road, and pedestrian passages made with a single wooden beam. The author highlights the need to improve the first one. The river is thus linked both to the daily work of farmers and to the circulation out of the parish.

The study published by the Museum in 2011 describes two levels in the mills of Cabeceiras: above is the mill; below, in the cabouco, the motor mechanism. The form of the building accompanies the operation of the mill. The survey records rectangular plants of varied dimensions, with the exception of a circular plant sour.

The granite dominates the walls, but not all the stone receives the same treatment. The study highlights the points subject to constructive requirements: corners, doors, windows and elements through which the water passes. In the wedges, the stones help to lock the construction; pads and shoulder pads frame the spans. An irregular wall can thus coexist with carefully chosen pieces.

This description belongs to the historical study, not to an inspection of the current buildings. To read the landscape, start with the route of the water and then ask where were the motor force and the work of grinding.